![\"a)](\"http:\/\/a-desk.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/1-3.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
One day after the Manifesta opening Christian Jankowski was sitting on a little bench at the en-trance of the coffeehouse schwarzescaf\u00e9 in the L\u00f6wenbr\u00e4ukunst – which is one of the spaces for the Historical Exhibition of Manifesta 11. He gave one interview after the other. It was quite impressive how attentive he remained in every conversation – always committed, witty and appar-ently not at all distracted by the surrounding gastronomic hubbub. Jankowski, born in 1968, is a true performer and socialite, who in 25 years of artistic practice has become more and more in-volved in involving others, initiating, playing and switching roles. He lives and works in Berlin, teaching as a professor at the Akademie der Bildenden K\u00fcnste in Stuttgart. Jankowski, therefore, seems to be quite a good choice for the 11th edition of Manifesta about \u201cWhat people do for money\u201d.<\/p>\n Are you satisfied with Manifesta 11 or do you have any form of hangover, as is often the case after organising such a big project?<\/strong> <\/p>\n All artists say in the end: this or that still has to be added or improved. In fact, I am very happy about what Manifesta 11 has now become. Although there are still some pieces I wasn\u2019t able to include: for example, a 4000 year-old hairdresser made from clay from Egypt or casts from the Lascaux Caves. But I think that all of the thirty projects have turned out very well. And this is much more important to me. With regard to the number of participating artists, I imagine I could have invited three times as many. It would\u2019ve been a fuller exhibition in an even fuller city\u2014a spectacle, an incredible experience of parallelism.<\/p>\n So Manifesta 11 was intended to become a spectacle?<\/strong><\/p>\n The term \u201cspectacle\u201d has a very superficial connotation initially, but it needn\u2019t be superficial. I wanted to go for a different biennial format for a change. It was all about ways of presenting an event differently, about its visual appearance\u2014that\u2019s what a special effect does. Some call it a special effect others call it a miracle. In the case of this Manifesta, we are dealing with a multiple appearance artwork: thirty joint ventures, the collaborations between artists and professional representatives in three respective manifestations at three different sites. First, the collaborative piece shown at the hosts\u2019 place of work, such as the fire station or police station, then at one of the Zurich institutions, such as L\u00f6wenbr\u00e4ukunst and Helmhaus\u2014entering into a dialogue with artworks by artists from the fifties in the context of the \u201cHistorical Exhibition: Sites Under Construction\u201d there. And finally in the so-called \u201cPavilion of Reflections\u201d floating on Lake Zurich, in the form of films. These ART DOCS, as we call them, present all the joint ventures and can be viewed in the Pavilion\u2019s open-air cinema at all times. Visitors, who have missed one or the other artwork at the above mentioned sites, will be able to catch the collaboration between artist and professionals in these ART DOCS. <\/p>\n What were the selection criteria for the participating artists?<\/strong><\/p>\n Mainly artists whom I found interesting during the twenty-five years I have been making art. Some are from my circle of close friends, such as John Arnold. I was immediately taken with his brilliant \u201cImbissy\u201d idea with haute cuisine because \u201cImbissy\u201d connotes \u201cembassy\u201d and of course takea-way\/snack diner in German, which is a perfect match with a clean Switzerland as a country of po-litical and economic diplomacy. Through Arnold I met the Berlin Band \u201cThe\/Das\u201d who composed the Manifesta 11 song, or Big Brigade&Megan Marlatt, for example, who made those papier m\u00e2ch\u00e9 heads depicting Hans Ulrich Obrist, Roberta Smith, and Jerry Satz. Another important selection criterion has been the inclusion of pioneers, such as Chris Burden, Guillaume Bijl, Susan Hiller, or Harun Farocki into the Historical Exhibitions, which I curated together with Francesca Gavin. Or my former professor, Franz Eherhard Walther, who was part of the joint ventures. If I had studied somewhere else it would have been somebody else and I never would have become curator of the Manifesta, for example. I cannot do anything but refer to my own life, my own standards of art and artists, which I find exciting. My attitude remains the same whether it says artist or curator on my forehead. Franz Ehrhard Walther plays a central role in my overall concept of art. I partially inherited the fun of playing with language and wit from Werner B\u00fcttner, who also taught in Hamburg at that time, when I was studying there with Stanley Brown, among others. In general, I was fascinated by the artists belonging to the St\u00e4del Circle, such as Martin Kippenberger, as well as by their predilection for irony and provocative images.<\/p>\n And then there are the discoveries\u2014amongst whom are many of the younger generation who I didn\u2019t even know about or only vaguely before the Manifesta. Fundamentally, the Manifesta was a fabulous opportunity to ask my artist and curator friends which studios in which cities I should visit. So I travelled a lot in 2015\u2014together with my curatorial coordinator, Maria Isserlis.<\/p>\n Finally, there was the corrective action of my curatorial advisor, John Beewson, who was in charge of the lists and who discovered that \u201cfor a European Biennial, there are too many Germans, Amer-icans, and Mexicans!\u201d This is because I`ve had a lot of shows in these countries. Suddenly, I real-ized that we needed more artists from Eastern Europe\u2014bearing the motto \u201calways maintain a balance!\u201d One of the best trips for me was to Prague where I saw more than one brilliant exhibi-tion and met lots of really talented artists, many of whom are represented at Manifesta. But sometimes these parameters go a bit haywire, because shows like this aren\u2019t worked out on a cal-culator. Whatever you do is going to be wrong and I freely admit: I haven\u2019t invited as many wom-en as men, because it wasn\u2019t the most important criterion for me.<\/p>\n The ART DOCS are based on a dogma approved of by Jean Luc Godard.<\/strong><\/p>\n The dogma of the ART DOCS regulates the structure of the films, and the roles ascribed to the Art Detectives as guides and commentators of the joint ventures. It is about deconstructing the doc-umentation of art. I loved it when Jan Hoet presented documenta in his legendary marathon talks.<\/p>\n How important is the Cabaret Voltaire\u2014the birthplace of the Dada movement – as one of Manifes-ta 11\u2019s sites?<\/strong><\/p>\n All the sites are equally important. The composition made up of the three manifestations of the joint ventures is of central significance for Manifesta 11. The spaces in the Historical Exhibition and the thematically-structured dialogues taking place there, form one pole so to speak, whereas the performances at the Cabaret Voltaire form the other\u2014in the Here and Now and under the same conditions as the joint-venture artworks. This implies\u2014in the Cabaret Voltaire\u2014that everybody is a producer and then becomes a consumer of performances. No one can see a performance without having performed his own\u2014together with a representative of a profession. Throughout the exhibition\u2019s runtime, the Cabaret has been transformed into an artists\u2019 guild, where creativity is the currency and not money. The role of the guild master is played by the Swiss artist Manuel Scheiwiller, who decides which performance will be staged. The attitude of \u201cI am a consumer, I can buy whatever I want where I want\u201d doesn\u2019t cut it here in the artists\u2019 guildhall. You have to participate in order to experience the Here and Now. The documentation is open to everybody: i.e., the drawings used to apply for a performance as well as the Polaroids taken of respective per-formances.<\/p>\n Was the list\u2014presented to the artists beforehand, containing the names of about 300 Zurich resi-dents representing all kinds of professions prepared to enter into a joint venture with an artist\u2014designed to be some form of cartographic survey of the Zurich working environment? Or was it more a matter of coincidence which professions were involved in the artistic process?<\/strong><\/p>\n One doesn\u2019t exclude the other. The artists chose the professions. One basic principle of all Mani-festa presentations thus far has been that the artists\u2019 inspiration leads the way. And the relation between inspiration and coincidence is a complex one that isn\u2019t governed by statistics. I also un-derstand \u201cWhat the people do for money\u201d on a different level to Jan Hoet\u2019s Chambre D\u2019amis exhi-bition format in Ghent. Private citizens offered their homes to the artists and their work in that context, whereas in Zurich, professionals offer their workplaces, their professional networks, and their know-how. You have to involve yourself in the joint venture. Of course, there were a few artists who were unable to enter into such a joint venture or collaborate with the Manifesta due to a different time constraints or even their wounded vanity. It\u2019s a bit like participating in a Land Art show and then ultimately demanding a white wall or an air-conditioned space. For me, there wasn\u2019t a specific psychological concept, which the artworks would effectively illustrate, because the ideology was intended to develop from one individual to the next within the process of crea-tion. So the personalities of the people involved in a joint venture was extremely decisive in all this.<\/p>\n Did you start off with a certain working concept\u2014say, Karl Marx\u2019s \u201cEconomy in its influential role\u201d or Max Weber\u2019s concept of \u201ccorrelations\/mechanisms of power, culture, and economy\u201d? <\/strong> <\/p>\n My intention is not to illustrate any existing theory. I don\u2019t want to dictate anything to the artists. They are free to make their own choices with regard to which joint venture they prefer. All possibilities are encoded in the encounters. This is much more complex and intelligent than a banner slogan, such as: \u201cI will now open up a new perspective on ways of working in tomorrow\u2019s world.\u201d<\/p>\n Throughout the official opening at the University of Zurich, someone was distributing a leaflet in which Manifesta was criticized for its lack of art about work, such as \u201cunpaid Care and Reproduction.\u201d Another criticism was that Manifesta 11 used unpaid trainees rather than students as gallery attendants, depriving the latter of an opportunity to earn income.<\/strong><\/p>\n As I already mentioned before: I am interested in art and not a sociogram of professions. That people have been exploited by the Manifesta is a very simplistic statement. We do not want people to lose their jobs. But such structures, like the support from trainees, are basic structures at all huge art events such as the documenta and the Venice Biennale. It is something like a Gesamtkun-stwerk or universal work of art, through which the gods of art are venerated. Those who have participated in such events are very proud when they can say later on that their work was part of the documenta and such like. And I would have loved to have talked to the author of the flyer, who goes by the pseudonym of Regina Pfister. She certainly achieved quite a lot. And actually it is a good thing as well that I managed to cause a few shockwaves in certain areas with Manifesta 11. <\/p>\n In the S\u00fcddeutsche Zeitung, J\u00f6rg Heiser asked whether the curators\u2019 era has now finally come to an end. The US-artist collective DIS has curated this year\u2019s edition of the Berlin Bienniale. Elmgreen&Dragset have been invited to curate the next Instanbul Bienniale. Are artists taking the curators\u2019 jobs?<\/strong><\/p>\n I don\u2019t think so! How long has the word curator been in use? What was the professional term for the one who drew the first hunters and animals on the walls of Lascaux. Was he the curator? Did he paint or did he commission someone else to do the job? How many artists have already been curating up until now? When artists began organizing salons for their Berlin and Paris exhibitions, nobody was shouting: \u201cThe artists are taking the curators\u2019 jobs!\u201d I don\u2019t believe in one or the other. I only believe in the coexistence of both. Of course, every artist can have another string to his bow and work as a curator. The same applies to curators. At any rate, in order to be successful as a curator you need a lot of courage, luck, and personality.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" One day after the Manifesta opening Christian Jankowski was sitting on a little bench at the en-trance of the coffeehouse schwarzescaf\u00e9 in the L\u00f6wenbr\u00e4ukunst – which is one of the…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1345,"featured_media":9513,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_relevanssi_hide_post":"","_relevanssi_hide_content":"","_relevanssi_pin_for_all":"","_relevanssi_pin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_unpin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_include_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_exclude_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_no_append":"","_relevanssi_related_not_related":"","_relevanssi_related_posts":"","_relevanssi_noindex_reason":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3821],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n![\"b)](\"http:\/\/a-desk.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/6.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"c)](\"http:\/\/a-desk.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/4.jpg\")
<\/p>\n